GM crops can boost productivity in lean times. Prince Charles was wrong
to dismiss them out of hand
In 2007, 12 million farmers grew GM crops over an area of 114m hectares
(281m acres) in 23 different countries. From the prairie farmers who
grow GM crops across 10,000 hectares to the farmers who use this
technology on less than one hectare, GM is a global reality and is used
on average on areas of just less than 10 hectares.
Not quite the technology that only helps big corporations and big
farmers, as suggested by Prince Charles, then. In reality, of those
farmers growing GM crops, 11 million are resource-poor farmers living
and working in developing countries such as South Africa, India and
China. Contrary to the allegations made, many of the seeds are supplied
through their own countries' institutes, and are designed to help solve
problems that farmers have in growing crops for food, feed, fibres and
fuel.
Food security is back on the international agenda - after the surpluses
of food experienced in the 1970s and 1980s, the demand for food is again
starting to exceed supply. For us in the affluent west, food security
issues mean food inflation, but for the developing countries it means
food availability. The cure is productivity - producing more food (on
the same or less land) to increase supply and meet that demand.
Increases in crop yields have long been the advantage of GM, and this is
now a crucial consumer benefit with international importance.
What is absolutely clear, however, is that GM is not the only solution -
there is no magic bullet, no quick fix. But it can help by improving
productivity, improving food quality, and reducing the environmental
footprint of agriculture. A recent peer-reviewed report on the subject
by PG Economics demonstrated that production of soybeans, corn, and
cotton in areas planted with GM crops were respectively 20%, 7%, and 15%
higher than would have been the case had this technology not been used
by farmers. Furthermore, less fuel use and additional soil carbon
storage from reduced ploughing, facilitated by the use of GM crops, was
equivalent to removing over 6 million cars from the road for one year.
Not quite the environmental disaster some claim.
So who benefits from the use of new technology in farming? Are "giant
corporations" really the sole beneficiaries of this technology? A recent
Belgian study suggests that " ... on average, two-thirds of the global
benefits are shared 'downstream', ie, among domestic and foreign farmers
and consumers, while only one-third is extracted 'upstream', ie, by
biotechnology developers and seed suppliers." Likewise, Terri Raney,
from the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the UN, recently pointed
out, " ... the benefits are shared by consumers, technology suppliers
and adopting farmers, although non-adopting farmers are penalised as
their competitors achieve efficiency gains they are denied."
Being able to achieve this around the world is one thing; for UK
farmers, access to this technology requires a seismic change in the
processing of GM applications stuck in a dysfunctional European
regulatory system, and an ability to carry out field trials without fear
of vandalism.
Europe has always been a powerhouse of agricultural production - with
climate change, the onus on the UK and Europe to increase agricultural
productivity has never been greater. That's why we need to ensure that
any further discussions about GM are scientific and based on solid
facts. |
Europe's Funding of Worldwide Activism
An Inconvinient Truth (Image):
Nature Biotechnology: Volume 25, Number 12, Dec 2007
EMBO Reports: Contents: Volume 9, Number S1
Bioentrepreneur: From Bench to Boardroom
.....for an
update on the latest events focusing on life science entrepreneurship
around the world.
How the EU can Fund your Company
Alfalfa Benifits from Medicago truncatula:
The RCT1 Gene M.truncatula Confers Broad-spectrum Resistance to Anthracnose in Alfalfa
Consortium for Functional Glycomics
Charles's Fantasy Farming Won't Feed Africa's Poor
A Conversation with Nina V. Fedroff , Advocate for Science Diplomacy
Scientists Target Super Cassava
Who Will China Feed?
http://www.businessbhaskar.com/article.php?id=2179 ( Language: Hindi )
Vitamin C and Cancer Revisited
Moving Ahead with an International
Human Epigenome Project
Shrewd Survival Strategy ( Tuberculosis )
World Bank Biofuels Report Finally Released :
The combination of higher
energy prices and related increases in fertilizer prices and transport
costs, and dollar weakness caused food prices to rise by about 35-40
percentage points from January 2002 until June 2008. |